Subject: [Sipping] Review of draft-ietf-sipping-policy-package-01

From: "Even, Roni" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 16:09:45 +0300

Draft:  draft-ietf-sipping-policy-package-01
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 15/8/06
Review Deadline: 25/8/06
Status: Initial review 

Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review.

In section 3.3 on the open issue, I think that XML is good direction, using it will enable to define media policy not in terms of SDP architecture. Still there is a need to be able to map from SDP to XML.  The mapping should allow specifying per session and per media policy.

In section 3.6 on the open issue, I think that there should be a basic set at least the media and bandwidth. The subscriber may update this information, for example, if the peer sends a re-invite. This can be very useful for bandwidth management and even provide a tool for resource scheduling application that will work also with the non session specific policy. 

In section 3.9 why SHOULD is used and not SHALL, if a session policy is in place and a UA subscribed to the policy server then it must work according to the policy.

Roni Even

*******************************************************************
Roni Even
Polycom NSD
 
Tel: +972-3-9251200
Mobile: +972-54-5481099
Fax: +972-3-9211571
email: [email-masked]

_______________________________________________
Sipping mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipping
This list is for NEW development of the application of SIP
Use [email-masked] for questions on current sip
Use [email-masked] for new developments of core SIP