Subject: Re: [Softwires] Softwires Digest, Vol 75, Issue 46

From: Xiaohong Deng <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:27:45 +0800

Hi Dapeng,

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:00 AM, <[email-masked]> wrote:

>
> On 2/24/12 7:21 AM, "liu dapeng" <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> >Hi Med,
> >
> >Yes, I am considering CPE. There are two reasons:
> >
> >1. The definition of "stateless" should not be bind to the provider's
> >network. The document should define "stateless" for the Internet not
> >only for the operator.
>

Defining/Attempting "statless" for the Internet would be a bit ambitious
IMHO.
Consider routing tables on routers, firewall rules on firewall devices,
user data base
on servers...No means exists to avoid "state" in that sense, thereby
invalidating of
definition of "statelss for the Internet".

Cheers,
Xiaohong