Subject: [stir] Why mandate "orig" claim if not modified?

From: Christer Holmberg <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 08:09:16 +0000

Hi,

A generic question, but that came to my mind when reading the divert draft.

Why does one have to include the “orig” claim in the divert PASSporT? It is already present in the “original” PASSporT, and it isn’t modified.

There is probably a good reason, but I think it would be good to document it (or, if documented elsewhere, reference it).

Regards,

Christer