Subject: Re: [Teas] Update on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect

From: "Matt Hartley (mhartley)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 16:14:01 +0000

Himanshu,

Hopefully your comments will have been addressed in v-04. Please could you have a look and let us know if you have any further concerns?

Cheers

Matt

> I would like the authors to expand on example case discussed in the draft
> when CE1 is dual-homed to two PEs.
> SRLG collect is fine but what was not clear to me on how CE1 request setup
> of maximal SRLG diverse path to other PE.
> 
> SRLG update section is thin, it needs to be expanded.
> The updated collected SRLG information during refresh and how and what
> client does with it..
> 
> Thanks,
> Himanshu
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Teas [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Matt Hartley
> (mhartley)
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 12:04 PM
> To: TEAS WG ([email-masked])
> Cc: Matt Hartley (mhartley)
> Subject: [Teas] Update on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect
> 
> A brief update on draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-srlg-collect, since we won't be
> presenting next week.
> 
> Markups from the AD review have been done and published, and the document
> is now in GEN-ART review. There are some comments and nits to be addressed
> and cleanup/clarification to be done. We also have an open issue regarding
> whether a SRLG-collection request should be mirrored in the Resv LSP-
> attributes; we welcome comments on this (or anything else) on the list.
> 
> Next steps: complete GEN-ART review and publish updated document version,
> and then IESG review.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Matt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Teas mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/teas