Subject: Re: [Teep] Call for adoption of draft-thaler-teep-otrp-over-http

From: "Nancy Cam-Winget (ncamwing)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2019 21:36:09 +0000

Hi,
There has been discussion on the different formats TEEP may need, the transport is independent.  We should discuss whether these formats all need to be required by TEEP or not as there seems to be differing opinions on that topic.

That said, I believe the group has consensus in adopting this draft with no issues to the adoption for specifying HTTP as a transport for OTrP.

Dave, please post a new version with the appropriate naming as a TEEP WG draft.  You can also check that version into GitHub so that we can track issues and comments against the draft as well.

Thanks!
                Nancy

From: TEEP <[email-masked]> on behalf of ncamwing <[email-masked]>
Date: Monday, May 27, 2019 at 16:12
To: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Teep] Call for adoption of draft-thaler-teep-otrp-over-http

Hi,
At the IETF 104 TEEP session, we discussed the need to transport the OTrP messages and Dave has drafted a document to specify HTTPs as a transport.
This begins a 2 week period to determine interest in adopting this draft as a working group item.  The poll will close on June 10th EOD PDT.

The draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-thaler-teep-otrp-over-http/

Minutes from IETF 104:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-104-rats/

Warm regards,
                Nancy