Subject: Re: [TICTOC] Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10.txt>

From: Jiangyuanlong <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:08:53 +0000

Hi all,

We have not received any comments during the 2nd IETF Last Call.
But based on the comments we received from the YANG doctor and the IESG members, the following changes are in our consensus:
1.	Change "MAY" to "can" and "SHOULD" to "MUST" in the 3rd paragraph of Page 4;
2.	Change "MAY" to "SHOULD" in the last paragraph of Page 8;
3.	Add "<" and ">" to the email address of Rodney in Page 9;
4.	Rephrase the 2nd paragraph in Page 29 to:
"Under the assumptions of section A.1, the first IEEE 1588 YANG module's prefix will be the same as the last IETF 1588 YANG module's prefix (i.e. "ptp"). Consequently, other YANG modules can preserve the same import prefix "ptp" to access PTP nodes during the migration from the last IETF 1588 YANG module to the first IEEE 1588 YANG module."
These changes are mainly editorial and have no impact on the YANG module itself. 

Thanks much to all those who have commented on this draft.

Regards,
Yuanlong on behalf all coauthors

-----Original Message-----
From: DraftTracker Mail System [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 4:21 PM
To: Karen O'Donoghue <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: Last Call Expired: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10.txt>

Please DO NOT reply to this email.

I-D: <draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-10.txt>
Datatracker URL: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang/

IETF Last Call has ended, and the state has been changed to Waiting for AD Go-Ahead.