Subject: Re: [Drip] [Internet]Re: draft-ietf-drip-arch-13

From: "shuaiizhao(Shuai Zhao)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 04:56:27 +0000

Thanks Med for your comment,

I have gone through all the Github issues in https://github.com/ietf-wg-drip/draft-ietf-drip-arch/issues

There is total 25 of them, I closed 5 of them in https://github.com/ietf-wg-drip/draft-ietf-drip-arch/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aclosed. Those are small issues which can be dealt fairly easily unless you have different opinion. If that is the case, please comment back to those closed issues.

For the other 20 open issues<https://github.com/ietf-wg-drip/draft-ietf-drip-arch/issues>, most of them can be fixed without much trouble. I have either commented or suggested changes for them. So please have a look at it and reply with simple suggestion which I can implement them in next revision. There are only a few places where Bob can have a better sense.

NOTE> Someone needs to invite Stu and Bob to Github to make comments…..

Best,
Shuai

From: Tm-rid <[email-masked]> on behalf of "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tuesday, June 15, 2021 at 12:27 AM
To: "Card, Stu" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
Subject: [Internet]Re: [Drip] draft-ietf-drip-arch-13

Hi Stu,

Can you please share the major issues you were referring to? Thank you.

Cheers,
Med

De : Tm-rid [mailto:[email-masked]] De la part de Card, Stu
Envoyé : lundi 14 juin 2021 19:42
À : Daniel Migault <[email-masked]>
Cc : [email-masked]
Objet : Re: [Drip] draft-ietf-drip-arch-13

Yes, please, I invite list discussion ASAP, as some of my comments were on what I consider major issues.

I feel we have gutted our Architecture document so that it does not actually describe an architecture.

Fixing that is fundamental, not a nit.

On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:18 AM Daniel Migault <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
Hi,

I am wondering if we could plan to have these issues resolved and a new version published for the next IETF meeting. Remaining issues may also be discussed during the meeting itself, but we need to make sure most of them have been cleaned out. Stu made also some comments that we need to keep track with and address.

Yours,
Daniel

On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:10 AM Daniel Migault <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> wrote:
Hi,

I have reviewed the arch-13 document - at least the first 5 sections - and opened some issues [1].

Yours,
Daniel

[1] https://github.com/ietf-wg-drip/draft-ietf-drip-arch/issues

--
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

--
Daniel Migault
Ericsson
--
Tm-rid mailing list
[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tm-rid

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.