Subject: Re: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20)

From: "Liubing (Remy)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:54:30 +0000

The mBFD supports the fast detection of faults of a distribution trees so I believe it aids the deployment of TRILL. The bootstrapping add-on looks fine.

Support for its publication.

Thanks,
Remy

From: trill [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2017 12:25 PM
To: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>
Subject: [trill] WG LC on draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt - 2/7/2016 to 2/21/2016 - Second WG LC (3/7 to 3/20)

We did not receive any comments on the WGLC for draft-ietf-p2mp-bfd-04.txt (https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/trill/current/msg07692.html).  Perhaps this was because I started the WG LC during Chinese new year.   We will try a second WG LC before declaring "no support for this draft"

In your comments please consider,

1)      Does the support of multi-point BFD aid deployments?
2)      Are the suggested additions to RFC7177 bootstrapping sufficient for this technology?
3)      Do you feel this technology is ready for standardization?

Sue Hares