Subject: Re: [Unbearable] [Internet-Drafts] One spec (#11)

From: John Bradley <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 13:55:00 -0300

If later on it makes sense to combine them the WG can decide that.

For the moment I personally agree with Andrel that keeping the bindings separate makes sense.

The conversations should probably be on the WG [email-masked] list or copied to it so that everyone sees them.

John B.

> On Apr 21, 2015, at 1:33 PM, Andrei-Popov <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> It is very likely that we'll want to use Token Binding with protocols other than HTTPS. Token Binding protocol message formats, key parameter negotiation, etc. are likely to be the same regardless of the application protocol, but the encapsulation of Token Binding messages in the application protocol will look different in each application protocol.
> 
> This is why I believe that keeping Token Binding protocol basics in a separate I-D is beneficial. In terms of presentation, we can certainly make improvements so that the two documents are more readable.
> 
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub <https://github.com/TokenBinding/Internet-Drafts/issues/11#issuecomment-94863704>.
>