Subject: Re: Another requirement [Re: New (-02) version of IPv6 CPE Router draft is available for review]

From: Francois-Xavier Le Bail <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:57:52 -0700 (PDT)

--- On Thu, 7/31/08, Antonio Querubin <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Francois-Xavier Le Bail wrote:
> >> Another requirement:
> >> The CPE should install a discard (null) or
> >> unreachable route for the delegated prefix.

> The choice to reply with an 
> unreachable or just silently discard for unused
> subnets/addresses within 
> delegated prefix should be a vendor option though.

Or setup option ?
Or managed by the ISP ?

Francois-Xavier