Subject: [v6ops] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-jaeggli-v6ops-indefensible-nd/ - explination

From: joel jaeggli <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:21:27 -0600

Hi,

I submitted this draft as a talking point to the discussion in 6man
related to IID prefix length. 

 SAILing LAPs - currently at 72 messages and counting

The draft is specifically related to work previously done in v6ops (rfc
6583) rather than 6man and does not itself propose an protocol changes
hence my inclusion of the v6ops label.

I have not specific goals for advancement or adoption at this time apart
from making a point about NDP mitigitations and in particular variable
length subnet masks.

Thanks

joel