Subject: [v6ops] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-01.txt

From: Lencse Gábor <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 21:12:39 +0200

Hi,

We have revised our draft "Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies 
for IPv4aaS".

Special thanks to Ole Troan for his many correction recommendations, to 
Cameron Byrne for traffic statistics, and to everyone who contributed.

Further comments are welcome.

What kind of further aspects of comparison would be useful for you if 
you would need to choose an IPv4aaS technology for your network?

Best regards,

Gábor Lencse

-------- Továbbított üzenet --------
Tárgy: 	New Version Notification for 
draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-01.txt
Dátum: 	Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:09:29 -0700
Feladó: 	[email-masked]
Címzett: 	Lee Howard <[email-masked]>, Jordi Palet 
<[email-masked]>, Jordi Palet Martinez 
<[email-masked]>, Gabor Lencse <[email-masked]>, 
Richard Patterson <[email-masked]>

A new version of I-D, draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Gabor Lencse and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:		draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison
Revision:	01
Title:		Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS
Document date:	2018-10-22
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		16
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-01
Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-lmhp-v6ops-transition-comparison-01

Abstract:
    Several IPv6 transition technologies can be used to provide IPv4-as-
    a-service (IPv4aaS) to the customers, while the ISPs have only IPv6
    in their access and or core network. All these technologies have
    their advantages and disadvantages. Depending on several various
    conditions and preferences, different technologies may prove to be
    the most appropriate solution. This document examines the five most
    prominent IPv4aaS technologies considering several different aspects
    in order to provide network operators with an easy to use guideline
    for selecting the technology that suit their needs the best.

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat