Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

From: Jan Zorz - Go6 <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 10:15:17 +0100

On 17/09/2020 10:05, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote on 16/09/2020 23:44:
>> This problem is so real in deployments where operators decided to go 
>> with non-persistent IPv6 prefix delegations that we documented it in 
>> RIPE-690 where we suggest to deploy prefix delegations as 
>> persistent/static as possible so networks/hosts behind CPEs don't 
>> suffer from this issue.
> 
> You mean to have the ISPs to provide persistent state so that SLAAC can 
> handle things better?  Only half joking here :-)

What you say - that actually sums it up quite nicely :)

"Dear ISP, please make your network topology as static as possible so 
SLAAC (in current shape and form) doesn't break end-users connectivity 
in some quite interesting ways..."

:)

Cheers, Jan