Subject: Re: [yang-doctors] Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain

From: Jeff Tantsura <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 09:31:15 -0800

Dear RTGWG,

This concludes the WGLC for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain.

I’d like to thanks Yang-doctors for their thoughtful reviews and the authors for timely (pretty much immediate!) responses and updated draft! 

I’ll be done with the shepherd review in a day and will send the draft to the IESG for publication.

Cheers,

Jeff

From: Jeff Tantsura <[email-masked]>
Date: Monday, February 6, 2017 at 10:35
To: RTGWG <[email-masked]>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>
Subject: Re: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain 

Dear RTGWG,

There have been significant changes to the draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain draft.

We would like the wg to review the updated draft and hence start another, 1 week long WGLC.

Please indicate support/ no-support by February 13, 2017.

Thanks,

Jeff & Chris

From: Jeff Tantsura <[email-masked]>
Date: Friday, September 9, 2016 at 16:11
To: RTGWG <[email-masked]>
Cc: rtgwg-chairs <[email-masked]>, <[email-masked]>
Subject: Last Call for draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain 

Dear RTGWG,

The authors have requested the RTGWG to last call draft-ietf-rtgwg-yang-key-chain 

There was consensus that document is ready for the last call during the last IETF meeting and the authors have addressed all the comments from Directorate QA review.

Please indicate support or no-support by September 23rd, 2016. 

IPR:

If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to this email.

of whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The response needs to be sent to the RTGWG mailing list. 

The document will not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from each author and each 

individual that has contributed to the document.

Thanks,

Jeff & Chris